It's just days away ... history. Racists everywhere are downing Schlitz and lamenting the death of America. Liberals look to their copy of the "Hope" propaganda poster (for shame, Sheppard) and pray that all will be different.
Don't misunderstand me. I realize the importance of Obama's presidency, and I know what it will do for our image throughout the world. At this point, however, even electing Jack from Jack in the Box would help our world standing. I don't think, however, that much will change here in America.
As I write this, I am listening to the "Free the West Memphis 3" benefit CD. We should all know the story. Three teens charged with murder by a jury that couldn't tell its collective ass from a hole in the ground in a state where lynching is just something to do on a Sunday. It seems that the three are innocent, but the South was never very good at letting facts get in the way. The music community, among others, have rallied to the men's defense. People still think, however, that if you wear black you worship the devil. (Priest and Raiders fans excluded, of course.)
And that's why I don't think things will change with Obama.
Our stupidity is deeply rooted in a history of hypocritical morals and a superior sense of self. That sort of thing can't be overcome with grand speeches and basketball courts. It takes the equivalent of a cultural inferno to wipe that off the map. Hell, there are still people out there who seriously think black and white people shouldn't marry each other. Obama is not going to change any minds. He'll be a "credit" to his "race," that's for sure, but let's face it -- many people will never accept the fact that a black man holds the highest office in the land.
The flip side of all this is that he is still part of the status quo. He's a slimy politician who got to where he is by being shrewd (with a dose of backstabbing). You can say Baby Bush stole the election the first time around, but Obama manipulated this one from day one. He is politics as usual, and his cabinet proves it.
But isn't a little better better than no better at all?
I've never been one to believe in voting for the lesser of two evils. I can't give in like that. I can say this, though. Obama was the less scary of the two men if only for foreign policy. I'll grant him that. And the fact that he scares certain segments of the public makes me giggle. But hope? I have none. He didn't come out of left field to wow the public. He trapped people and set the stage for the masses several years ago with an incredible speech at the Democratic Convention ... one that assured he'd be looked at by the left and middle.
Kudos to you, Obama. Where Baby Bush is as subtle as a hand grenade, you proved you are as slick as poison in the well.
Oh, and unless the economy really tanks, I think you have fooled the public well enough to enjoy another four years.
You know who our first black president should have been? One who would have really stirred shit up? Huey P. Newton. Still think Obama is that progressive? I didn't think so.
3 comments:
It really is insane, and points out a huge problem with the left -- it's just like the right.
You and I talked about his Democratic Convention speech a few years ago, and we both thought he'd be running and had a good chance of winning. I don't know if you remember that, but we both saw it. I remember neither of us knew much about him at the time.
Oddly enough, I don't think people know much (important) about him now, but they sure do love him. White guilt, I think, had a lot to do with this election. I think white guilt can sometimes have some good side effects, but this was not one of them.
My dad voted for Eldridge Cleaver for president back in 1968. (The whole rapist thing caused drama in the household according to family lore.) My father looks so mild, doesn't he? But then, when then Governor Reagan said "If it takes a bloodbath, let's get it over with" regarding protestors, dad wrote him a letter offering a bloodbath "at your feet." He's on a list somewhere, pops is.
Post a Comment